NURS 6512 Discussion: Decision Making When Treating Psychological Disorders

NURS 6512 Discussion: Decision Making When Treating Psychological Disorders

Main Discussion Post:

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Attentiondeficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most prevalent neuropsychiatric disorders of childhood and adolescence and is associated with significant impairment in academic, social, and occupational functioning (Ng, 2017). “Neuroimaging studies indicate structural and functional abnormalities in multiple brain areas, including the frontal cortez, basal ganglia, brainstem, and cerebellum- regoins involved with regulating attention , impulsivity, and motor activity” (Rosenthal & Burchum, 2021, p. 250-251).

Case Scenario

My selected scenario describes an eight year old girl (Katie), who was referred to psychiatry by her primary care provider to be evaluated for ADHD. Background information consists of a completed Conner’s Teacher Rating Scale-Revised along with the teacher’s report. Katie exhibited inattention, forgetfulness, was easily distracted, had poor follow through, and struggled in spelling and math. The diagnosis is confirmed as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder-predominantly inattentive type.

First medication to be prescribed would be Ritalin 10mg chewable tablet every morning. Stimulants are the first line choice for treatment of ADHD (Rosenthal & Burchum, 2021). Intuniv would not be my choice for the patient as it is a nonstimulant medication. On the same lines, Wellbutrin XR is not considered a stimulant and has not been well studied in its safety and efficacy in children (Ng, 2017). Nonstimulants are less affective that stimulants and are considered second –choice drugs (Rosenthal & Burchum, 2021). The search for nonstimulant alternatives for the management of ADHD in children is ongoing. As many as 20% of patients do not respond to stimulants, and stimulants may also worsen comorbid sleep, mood, and anxiety disorders and lead to problems of misuse and diversion (Ng, 2017).

At the four week follow up visit, the teacher reports seeing improvement in her behavior and performance during the morning hours but little improvement through the afternoon. Katie also reports a “funny feeling in her chest” with a heart rate in the 130’s. Stimulants will produce a small increase in heart rate and blood pressure at recommended doses. In the absence of cardiovascular disease, this increase in heart rate and blood pressure lacks clinical significance (Rosenthal & Burchum, 2021). A provider at this point could do additional testing to rule out any heart defects or heart disease. Additionally, obtaining an EKG could be done to confirm rhythm and rate.

My choice would be to continue with the Ritalin in an extended release form.  I would then change the medication to Ritalin LA 20mg to be taken in the morning. Taking a long acting form of the medication will enable Katie to have positive effects for a longer duration which will sustain her focus and academic success throughout the school day.

The four week follow up with the Ritalin LA shows the medication is helping Katie throughout her school day and heart rate is within normal limits. I would maintain this current dosing of medication as it seems to be effective with no reported negative side effects at this time.

Other Considerations

As a provider, I would want documentation of testing done to rule of a learning disorder as some of Katie’s symptoms could also be attributed to this. Identifying a learning disorder in the presence of ADHD could change the course of treatment. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder–predominantly inattentive presentation and specific learning disorder (SLD) are commonly co-occurring conditions (Friedman et al., 2019).  Children with ADHD and SLD are poorer responders to psychostimulant medications than those with ADHD alone (Friedman et al., 2019).

There also needs to be additional education for Katie’s parents, explaining the diagnosis of ADHD and the differences between the sub classifications; the predominately hyperactive-impulsive type, predominately inattentive type, or combined type. The parents currently deny the idea of ADHD because they do not have an accurate understanding of an ADHD diagnosis and that it can exist without the presence of hyperactivity.

 

References

Friedman, L. M., McBurnett, K., Dvorsky, M. R., Hinshaw, S. P., & Pfiffner, L. J. (2019). Learning disorder confers setting-specific treatment resistance for children with ADHD, predominantly inattentive presentation. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology49(6), 854-867. 

Ng, Q. X. (2017). A systematic review of the use of Bupropion for attention-deficit/Hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology27(2), 112-116. 

Rosenthal, L., & Burchum, J. (2021). Lehne’s Pharmacotherapeutics for advanced practice nurses and physician assistants (2nd ed.). Elsevier Health Sciences.

 

Discussion: Decision Making When Treating Psychological Disorders

Psychological disorders, such as depression, bipolar, and anxiety disorders can present several complications for patients of all ages. These disorders affect patients physically and emotionally, potentially impacting judgment, school and/or job performance, and relationships with family and friends. Since these disorders have many drastic effects on patients’ lives, it is important for advanced practice nurses to effectively manage patient care. With patient factors and medical history in mind, it is the advanced practice nurse’s responsibility to ensure the safe and effective diagnosis, treatment, and education of patients with psychological disorders.

Photo Credit: Getty Images/iStockphoto

For this Discussion, you will select an interactive media piece to practice decision making when treating patients with psychological disorders. You will recommend the most effective pharmacotherapeutic to treat the psychological disorder presented and examine potential impacts of pharmacotherapeutics on a patient’s pathophysiology.

To Prepare

  • Review this week’s interactive media pieces and select one to focus on for this Discussion.
  • Reflect on the decision steps in the interactive media pieces, and consider the potential impacts from the administration of the associated pharmacotherapeutics on the patient’s pathophysiology.

NURS 6512 Discussion: Decision Making When Treating Psychological Disorders

By Day 3 of Week 8

Post a brief explanation of the psychological disorder presented and the decision steps you applied in completing the interactive media piece for the psychological disorder you selected. Then, explain how the administration of the associated pharmacotherapeutics you recommended may impact the patient’s pathophysiology. How might these potential impacts inform how you would suggest treatment plans for this patient? Be specific and provide examples.

By Day 6 of Week 8

Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses and respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days who selected a different interactive media piece on a psychological disorder, and provide recommendations for alternative drug treatments to address the patient’s pathophysiology.

Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link, and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 8 Discussion Rubric

 

Post by Day 3 of Week 8 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 8

To Participate in this Discussion:

Week 8 Discussion

 Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Content

Name: NURS_6521_Week8_Discussion_Rubric

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least three credible sources.

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Post is cited with two credible sources.

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Contains some APA formatting errors.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Contains only one or no credible sources.

Not written clearly or concisely.

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness Points Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Posts main post by day 3

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not post by day 3

First Response Points Range: 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. .

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. .

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. .

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. .

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.

Participation Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days

Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_6521_Week8_Discussion_Rubric

 

 

Nursing Assignment Help
Calculate your paper price
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -

Why Work with Us

Top-notch Quality and Well-researched Paper

Here at Nursingassinmentshelp.com, we emphasize thorough research to ensure top-notch quality papers. We are aware that nursing learners should possess in-depth knowledge of research-based practices. As a result, we ensure that our writers strictly adhere to your instructions and are willing to add the touch of extra research to provide well-researched papers. At Nursingassinmentshelp.com, you can choose your academic level: high school, college/university, or post graduate levels. *Note: we emphasize extensive research and uncompromised quality regardless of your academic level.

Professional and Experienced Academic Writers

Our team of professional writers are well-versed with a wide range of health-related topics. Apart from reputation and experience in diverse topics, our writers are determined to follow instructions to provide quality papers. Many are native speaker and capable of adhering to up-to-date writing guidelines. With your collaboration, our writers will ensure that your academic journey is smooth and excellent.

Free Unlimited Revisions

You have the autonomy when it comes to scrutinizing our service. Therefore, you can send your order for free revision when you feel that we have missed some aspects consistent with instructions. Once we deliver your paper, you have up to 10 days to submit your order for review. You can do this by logging into your personal account or by contacting our support. Note that your paper's quality is our mission here at Nursingassignmentshelp.com.

Timely Delivery and 100% Money-Back-Guarantee

Timely delivery is a profound indicator of academic excellence. Here at Nursingassignmentshelp.com, we are aware that class assignments are timed and deadline-sensitive. Therefore, we deliver all papers in time without compromising their quality. Regardless of tough deadlines, we ensure that we address every aspect of the papers' instructions. In case we need more time to complete your paper, we shall collaborate with you for deadline extension. In case you cannot provide use with more time, we guarantee you a 100% refund. Remember, your satisfaction is our primary objective.

Original & Confidential

Plagiarism is a punishable offense that may cost you your present and future professional development. With this knowledge, we endeavor to deliver original, plagiarism-free papers. We use several proven software and tools such as Turnitin, LopesWrite, Safe Assign, and Copyscape to check your paper's originality before delivering it to you. Further, our editorial team emphasize word-to-word review of all quotations and citations to ensure that all the papers are original.

While you may feel that providing your information could infringe your privacy, we promise to keep your information confidential and secure by desisting from sharing individual data to third-party users. We value your information since it enables us to communicate with you and provide quality services.

24/7 Customer Support

Consistent and timely communication is crucial in ensuring quality services. Our support agents are available 24 hours a day and 7days a week with the commitment to providing you with the best customer service. In case of any suggestion or clarification, get in touch with us via the life chart option, email, or WhatsApp.

Try it now!

Calculate the price of your order

Total price:
$0.00

How it works?

Follow these simple steps to get your paper done

Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Our Services

No need to work on your paper at night. Sleep tight, we will cover your back. We offer all kinds of writing services.

Essays

Essay Writing Service

No matter what kind of academic paper you need and how urgent you need it, you are welcome to choose your academic level and the type of your paper at an affordable price. We take care of all your paper needs and give a 24/7 customer care support system.

Admissions

Admission Essays & Business Writing Help

An admission essay is an essay or other written statement by a candidate, often a potential student enrolling in a college, university, or graduate school. You can be rest assurred that through our service we will write the best admission essay for you.

Reviews

Editing Support

Our academic writers and editors make the necessary changes to your paper so that it is polished. We also format your document by correctly quoting the sources and creating reference lists in the formats APA, Harvard, MLA, Chicago / Turabian.

Reviews

Revision Support

If you think your paper could be improved, you can request a review. In this case, your paper will be checked by the writer or assigned to an editor. You can use this option as many times as you see fit. This is free because we want you to be completely satisfied with the service offered.

Open chat
Get in Touch with Our Live Chat Agents via WhatsApp at +1(256)-743-6183. Get Unlimited Access to Answers on Any Queries With Your Paper.