NURA 6063 Discussion Workplace Environment Assessment
I work for a company that has a rating of “moderately healthy.”
the place of employment (Clark, 2015). A lower score was what I expected, and I am surprised by the results. The rationale for this decision.
Because of the current pandemic, I was expecting a higher score than I actually received. Several employees have resigned in favor of higher-paying positions.
irritated by the pandemic’s effect on my life. However, the organization’s employees are united in their desire to improve.
our community’s well-being, and we have leaders who are willing to listen to our concerns and maintain a civil work environment. I
I was also surprised by the Even in the midst of a pandemic, we
Even on the weekends, our manager has been available to help us with our self-care needs.
Overnight, on weekends, and on holidays, to make sure the unit’s needs are met In the midst of the pandemic’s chaos and stress, I relocated to the city.
Intensive care ward I was greeted by a high-acuity unit that was even more crowded than a typical ICU. In spite of this, however,
found that the team worked well together and communicated effectively, presenting a work environment that was civil and healthy. they found that
to be a part of, and I take great pride in this.
Because of the shared mission, values, and goals, I came away with the impression that the organization was running smoothly.
and the organization’s objectives. Christianity’s healing mission is to be carried out in accordance with Christus Good Shepherd’s core values
Dignity, honesty, hard work, generosity, and stewardship are just a few of the values we hold dear.
creation of new approaches to health and well-being for the benefit of the community as a whole
be healed by Jesus Christ’s love (Christus Health, 2021). However, as evidenced by the assessment’s failure to fall,
For those in the highest paid positions, the current pandemic has increased stress levels and reduced their ability to earn as much money as they once did.
work.
During a recent stay in the hospital’s intensive care unit, a physician began yelling at me.
as well as complaining aloud to the patient about how late it was for her injections, all while barking orders at me in the heat of battle.
According to Clark (2015), the most effective way to stop rudeness is to address it immediately. However, mastering this skill necessitates time and effort.
The ability to. Due to the nature of the situation, I was unable to speak with the doctor outside of the
Fortunately, I have a fantastic team who worked with the doctor to resolve the issue in the patient’s room. The member of the team spoke softly to the
we are all exhausted, but that appropriate communication is necessary despite our exhaustion
essential for reducing work stress among staff and ensuring safe and effective patient care. Working in a civilized environment
effective teamwork is facilitated by effective communication (Liu, et. al., 2020). It is still effective even when working in stressful environments.
in order to achieve the best possible results for the entire team, each team member must promote a civil working environment
member.
References
Christus Health (2021). Christus Health: Our vision, mission, and values. Retrieved from https://www.christushealth.org/about/our-
mission-values-and-vision
Clark, C.M. (2015). Conversations to inspire and promote a more civil workplace. American Nurse Today, 10(11), 18-23. Retrieved
from .
Liu, Y., Vashdi, D. R., Cross, T., Bamberger, P., & Erez, A. (2020). Exploring the puzzle of civility: Whether and when team civil
communication influences team members’ role performance. Human Relations, 73(2), 215–241. https://doi-
org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1177/0018726719830164
How wholesome is your workplace?
You may believe your current organization runs smoothly, or you may believe it has many problems. You may encounter or even witness events that cause you to pause. However, just as you would not attempt to diagnose a patient’s health solely through observation, you should not attempt to solely through observation and opinion. Frequently, you perceive issues as problems that others do not; similarly, issues may be much deeper than leadership recognizes.
There are numerous factors and measures that can have an impact on organizational health. Civility is one of these. While an organization can implement policies to promote civility, how can it ensure that these are effectively managed? In this Discussion, you will look at how .
To Prepare:
- Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
- Review and complete the Work Environment Assessment Template in the Resources.
By Day 3 of Week 7
Post a brief description of the results of your Work Environment Assessment. Based on the results, how civil is your workplace? Explain why your workplace is or is not civil. Then, describe a situation where you have experienced incivility in the workplace. How was this addressed? Be specific and provide examples.
By Day 6 of Week 7
Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by sharing ideas for how shortcomings discovered in their evaluations and/or their examples of incivility could have been managed more effectively.
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 7 Discussion Rubric
Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 7
To participate in this Discussion:
Week 7 Discussion
Module 4: Communication and Relationship Building (Weeks 7-9)
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Diagnosis: Communication Breakdown [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
- Analyze strategies to address workplace incivility
- Analyze evidence-based theories for promoting organizational health
- Recommend
Due By | Assignment |
Week 7, Days 1–2 | Read the Learning Resources. Compose your initial Discussion post. |
Week 7, Day 3 | Post your initial Discussion post. Begin to compose your Assignment. |
Week 7, Days 4-5 | Review peer Discussion posts. Compose your peer Discussion responses. Continue to compose your Assignment. |
Week 7, Day 6 | Post two peer Discussion responses. |
Week 8, Days 1-7 | Continue to compose your Assignment. |
Week 9, Day 1-6 | Continue to compose your Assignment. |
Week 9, Days 7 | Deadline to submit your Assignment. |
Learning Resources
Required Readings
Broome, M., & Marshall, E. S. (2021). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
- Chapter 5, “Collaborative Leadership Contexts: It Is All About Working Together (pp. 155–178)
- Chapter 8, “Creating and Shaping the Organizational Environment and Culture to Support Practice Excellence” (pp. 237–272)
- Chapter 7, “Building Cohesive and Effective Teams” (pp. 212–231)
Select at least ONE of the following:
Required Media
Laureate Education (Producer). (2009a). Working with Groups and Teams [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6053_Module04_Week07_Discussion_Rubric
Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||
Main Posting | Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Post is cited with two credible sources.
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible sources.
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
|
Main Post: Timeliness | Points Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3. |
|
First Response | Points Range: 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
Second Response | Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
Participation | Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. |
|
Total Points: 100 | |||||
Name: NURS_6053_Module04_Week07_Discussion_Rubric