NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Evaluation Plan Essay

NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Evaluation Plan Essay

Assessment Description

Provide the following criteria in the evaluation, making sure it is comprehensive and concise:

  1. Discuss the expected outcomes for your evidence-based practice project proposal.
  2. Review the various data collection tools associated with your selected research design and select one data collection tool that would be effective for your research design. Explain how this tool is valid, reliable, and applicable.
  3. Select a statistical test for your project and explain why it is best suited for the tool you choose.
  4. Describe what methods you will apply to your data collection tool and how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool you selected.
  5. Propose strategies that will be taken if outcomes do not provide positive or expected results.
  6. Describe the plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation.

Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview” document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.

You are required to cite a minimum of five peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Complete the “APA Writing Checklist” to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and formatting criteria and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the completed checklist as an appendix at the end of your paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Resources

Collapse All

Evaluation of Bedside Shift Report: A Research and Evidence-Based Practice Initiative

Read “Evaluation of Bedside Shift Report: A Research and Evidence-Based Practice Initiative,” by Schirm, Banz, Swartz, and Richmo

… Read More

https://www-sciencedirect-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S0897189717301118#s0030

Reliability and Validity: Linking Evidence to Practice

Read “Reliability and Validity: Linking Evidence to Practice,” by Kamper, from Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical The

… Read More

https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.2519/jospt.2019.0702

Comparing Clinical Significance and Statistical Significance – Similarities and Differences

Read “Comparing Clinical Significance and Statistical Significance – Similarities and Differences,” by Zbrog (2021), located on t

… Read More

Clinical Significance vs. Statistical Significance

Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession

Review Chapter 20 in Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession.

View Resource

Research, Evidence-Based Practice, and Clinical Improvement/Innovation Posters

Read “Research, Evidence-Based Practice, and Clinical Improvement/Innovation Posters” (2015), from AORN Journal.

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=109809571&site=eds-live&scope=site

A Practical Definition of Evidence-Based Practice for Nursing

Read “A Practical Definition of Evidence-Based Practice for Nursing,” by Stannard, from Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing

… Read More

https://www-sciencedirect-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S1089947219303181

Evidence-Based Practice Educational Intervention Studies: A Systematic Review of What Is Taught and How It I s Measured

Read “Evidence-Based Practice Educational Intervention Studies: A Systematic Review of What is Taught and How it is Measured,” by

… Read More

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/scholarly-journals/evidence-based-practice-educational-intervention/docview/2089734479/se-2?accountid=7374

Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice

Read Chapter 4 and review Chapter 3 in Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice.

View Resource

Advanced Nursing Research: From Theory to Practice

Review Chapter 25 in Advanced Nursing Research: From Theory to Practice.

View Resource

Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Evaluation Plan – Rubric

Collapse All

Expected Outcomes for Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal

14.4 points

Criteria Description

Expected Outcomes for Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal

  1. 5: Excellent

14.4 points

Expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are discussed. Thorough explanations and strong supporting research are provided.

  1. 4: Good

13.25 points

Expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are discussed. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

12.67 points

Expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are summarized. More information is needed.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

11.52 points

Some expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are only partially outlined.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are not discussed.

Data Collection Tools

12 points

Criteria Description

Data Collection Tools

  1. 5: Excellent

12 points

A data collection tool is selected and a well-supported explanation for why the tool is valid, reliable, and applicable and would be effective for the research design is presented.

  1. 4: Good

11.04 points

A data collection tool is selected, and an explanation for why the tool would be effective for the research design is presented. An explanation for the tool is valid, reliable, and applicable. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

10.56 points

A data collection tool is selected, and a summary for why the tool would be effective for the research design is presented. A general explanation for the tool is valid, reliable, and applicable, but more information and support are needed.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

9.6 points

A data collection tool is selected, but it is unclear why the tool would be effective for the research design. A valid, reliable, and applicable explanation for the tool is incomplete.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

A data collection tool is not discussed.

Statistical Test for Project

12 points

Criteria Description

Statistical Test for Project

  1. 5: Excellent

12 points

A statistical test is selected, and a well-supported explanation for why the test is best suited for the tool is clearly presented.

  1. 4: Good

11.04 points

A statistical test is selected, and an explanation for why the test is best suited for the tool is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

10.56 points

A statistical test is selected, and a summary for why the test is best suited for the tool is presented. More information or support is needed.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

9.6 points

A statistical test is selected, but it is unclear why the test is best suited for the tool.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

A statistical test is omitted.

Methods Applied to Data Collection Tool

12 points

Criteria Description

Methods Applied to Data Collection Tool

  1. 5: Excellent

12 points

Methods that will be applied to the data collection are thoroughly discussed. A discussion of how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool selected are presented.

  1. 4: Good

11.04 points

Methods that will be applied to the data collection are discussed. A discussion of how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool selected is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

10.56 points

Methods that will be applied to the data collection are outlined. A summary of how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool selected is presented. More information or support is needed.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

9.6 points

Methods that will be applied to the data collection tool partially discussed. It is unclear how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool selected.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Methods that will be applied to the data collection tool are not discussed.

Strategies for Outcomes That Are Nonpositive

14.4 points

Criteria Description

Strategies for Outcomes That Are Nonpositive

  1. 5: Excellent

14.4 points

Strategies for nonpositive outcomes are presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.

  1. 4: Good

13.25 points

Clear and well-supported strategies for nonpositive outcomes are presented.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

12.67 points

General strategies for nonpositive outcomes are presented. More information and support are needed.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

11.52 points

Strategies for nonpositive outcomes are incomplete.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Strategies for nonpositive outcomes are not discussed.

Plans to Maintain, Extend, Revise, and Discontinue Proposed Solution

13.2 points

Criteria Description

Plans to Maintain, Extend, Revise, and Discontinue Proposed Solution

  1. 5: Excellent

13.2 points

Detailed and well-supported plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are presented.

  1. 4: Good

12.14 points

Plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

11.62 points

General plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are presented. More information and support are needed.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

10.56 points

Plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are incomplete.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are not discussed.

Required Sources

6 points

Criteria Description

Required Sources

  1. 5: Excellent

6 points

Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

  1. 4: Good

5.52 points

Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

5.28 points

Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4.8 points

Number of required sources is only partially met.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not included.

Thesis Development and Purpose

8.4 points

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

  1. 5: Excellent

8.4 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

  1. 4: Good

7.73 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

7.39 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

6.72 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Argument Logic and Construction

9.6 points

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

  1. 5: Excellent

9.6 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

  1. 4: Good

8.83 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

8.45 points

Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

7.68 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

6 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

  1. 5: Excellent

6 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

  1. 4: Good

5.52 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

5.28 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4.8 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

6 points

Criteria Description

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

  1. 5: Excellent

6 points

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

  1. 4: Good

5.52 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

5.28 points

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4.8 points

All format elements are correct.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Documentation of Sources

6 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

  1. 5: Excellent

6 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

  1. 4: Good

5.52 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

5.28 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4.8 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

 

Nursing Assignment Help
Calculate your paper price
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -

Why Work with Us

Top-notch Quality and Well-researched Paper

Here at Nursingassinmentshelp.com, we emphasize thorough research to ensure top-notch quality papers. We are aware that nursing learners should possess in-depth knowledge of research-based practices. As a result, we ensure that our writers strictly adhere to your instructions and are willing to add the touch of extra research to provide well-researched papers. At Nursingassinmentshelp.com, you can choose your academic level: high school, college/university, or post graduate levels. *Note: we emphasize extensive research and uncompromised quality regardless of your academic level.

Professional and Experienced Academic Writers

Our team of professional writers are well-versed with a wide range of health-related topics. Apart from reputation and experience in diverse topics, our writers are determined to follow instructions to provide quality papers. Many are native speaker and capable of adhering to up-to-date writing guidelines. With your collaboration, our writers will ensure that your academic journey is smooth and excellent.

Free Unlimited Revisions

You have the autonomy when it comes to scrutinizing our service. Therefore, you can send your order for free revision when you feel that we have missed some aspects consistent with instructions. Once we deliver your paper, you have up to 10 days to submit your order for review. You can do this by logging into your personal account or by contacting our support. Note that your paper's quality is our mission here at Nursingassignmentshelp.com.

Timely Delivery and 100% Money-Back-Guarantee

Timely delivery is a profound indicator of academic excellence. Here at Nursingassignmentshelp.com, we are aware that class assignments are timed and deadline-sensitive. Therefore, we deliver all papers in time without compromising their quality. Regardless of tough deadlines, we ensure that we address every aspect of the papers' instructions. In case we need more time to complete your paper, we shall collaborate with you for deadline extension. In case you cannot provide use with more time, we guarantee you a 100% refund. Remember, your satisfaction is our primary objective.

Original & Confidential

Plagiarism is a punishable offense that may cost you your present and future professional development. With this knowledge, we endeavor to deliver original, plagiarism-free papers. We use several proven software and tools such as Turnitin, LopesWrite, Safe Assign, and Copyscape to check your paper's originality before delivering it to you. Further, our editorial team emphasize word-to-word review of all quotations and citations to ensure that all the papers are original.

While you may feel that providing your information could infringe your privacy, we promise to keep your information confidential and secure by desisting from sharing individual data to third-party users. We value your information since it enables us to communicate with you and provide quality services.

24/7 Customer Support

Consistent and timely communication is crucial in ensuring quality services. Our support agents are available 24 hours a day and 7days a week with the commitment to providing you with the best customer service. In case of any suggestion or clarification, get in touch with us via the life chart option, email, or WhatsApp.

Try it now!

Calculate the price of your order

Total price:
$0.00

How it works?

Follow these simple steps to get your paper done

Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Our Services

No need to work on your paper at night. Sleep tight, we will cover your back. We offer all kinds of writing services.

Essays

Essay Writing Service

No matter what kind of academic paper you need and how urgent you need it, you are welcome to choose your academic level and the type of your paper at an affordable price. We take care of all your paper needs and give a 24/7 customer care support system.

Admissions

Admission Essays & Business Writing Help

An admission essay is an essay or other written statement by a candidate, often a potential student enrolling in a college, university, or graduate school. You can be rest assurred that through our service we will write the best admission essay for you.

Reviews

Editing Support

Our academic writers and editors make the necessary changes to your paper so that it is polished. We also format your document by correctly quoting the sources and creating reference lists in the formats APA, Harvard, MLA, Chicago / Turabian.

Reviews

Revision Support

If you think your paper could be improved, you can request a review. In this case, your paper will be checked by the writer or assigned to an editor. You can use this option as many times as you see fit. This is free because we want you to be completely satisfied with the service offered.

See all services
Open chat
Powered by Joinchat
Get in Touch with Our Live Chat Agents via WhatsApp at +1(256)-743-6183. Get Unlimited Access to Answers on Any Queries With Your Paper.