HCS 456 Week 5 Benchmark Assignment Risk Management Presentation Recent
Imagine you work as a risk management supervisor at a local health care facility. You have been asked by leadership to prepare a presentation for the stakeholders on the importance of risk management.
Create a 10- to 12-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation (not counting the title or reference slides) with detailed speaker notes of at least 100 words per slide.
Include the following in your presentation:
• Explain the concepts of risk management in the health care industry.
• Explain factors that influence risk management in the health care industry.
• Explain the relationship between risk management and quality management.
• Analyze the information and information technology methods needed to make risk-management decisions in the health care industry.
• Analyze key risk management tools in the health care industry.
• Analyze challenges in making risk management decisions.
Cite at least 4 peer-reviewed, scholarly, or similar references.
Format your presentation according to APA guidelines.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
Stakeholder Presentation Scoring Guide
Criteria | Non-performance | Basic | Proficient | Distinguished |
---|---|---|---|---|
Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal. | Does not describe an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal. | Describes an organizational or patient issue but the way in which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal is unclear or missing. | Explains an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal. | Explains an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal, noting potential consequences of not addressing the issue. |
Summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue. | Does not summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue. | Discusses an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan, but its relevance to an organizational or patient issue is unclear. | Summarizes an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue. | Summarizes an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue, noting specific sources of evidence used to develop the plan. |
Explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed. | Does not explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed. | Explains how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented or how the human and financial resources would be managed, but not both. | Explains how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed. | Explains how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed, providing real-world examples relevant to the context of the health care organization. |
Propose evidence-based criteria to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal. | Does not propose evidence-based criteria to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal. | Proposes irrelevant criteria or criteria not based in evidence to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal. | Proposes evidence-based criteria to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal. | Proposes evidence-based criteria to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal, noting specific sources of evidence used to develop the criteria. |
Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed speaker notes are provided. | Slides are difficult to read with multiple editing errors. No speaker notes provided. | Slides are easy to read with few editing errors. Speaker notes are sufficient to support the slides. | Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed speaker notes are provided. | Slides are easy to read and clutter free. Slide background is “visually” pleasing with a contrasting color for the text and may utilize graphics. Detailed speaker notes are provided. |
Organize content with clear purpose /goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years) with an APA formatted reference list with few errors. | Does not organize content with clear purpose/goals. Power point slides do not support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations. Sources are not relevant and/or evidence-based (published within 5 years). No reference list provided. | Organizes content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years) with a reference list not in APA format/or has many errors in format. | Organizes content with clear purpose /goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years) with an APA formatted reference list with few errors. | Organizes content with clear purpose/goals. Power point slides support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years) with a flawless APA formatted reference list. |