DNP 805 Topic 2 Discussion 2
DNPs are uniquely prepared and qualified to accept and work in a wide range of advanced healthcare roles, particularly clinical practice. Reduce costs by focusing on primary care, health promotion, and disease prevention as expert clinicians, school faculty, health care consultants, entrepreneurs, and scholars caring for multiple patient populations in various geographic areas, and as global health leaders (Zaccagnini & Pechacek, 2019). The DNP prepared nurse, as an expert clinician and academic scholar, can improve patient care by initiating quality improvement (QI) initiatives and assisting with healthcare policy development. In addition, he is knowledgeable and skilled in healthcare economics, finance, leadership, and quality improvement (Zaccagnini, & Pechacek, 2019).
Workflow is a repeatable series of standard tasks that needs to be completed to achieve specific goals such as clinical processes in nursing. So, healthcare providers (HCPs) should be involved in the creating, planning and the implementation of health information technologies (health IT), to improve support. When an organization adopts an electronic health record (EHR) it changes the usual workflow standard. Therefore, the workflow is redesigned to suit the new system. The workflow redesign is a process of looking at all the aspects of the organization and mapping out current workflows and analyzing how the work gets done in the organization and they plan for the future and create new workflows to increase the organizations efficiency and the quality of health care. Workflow redesign helps most organizations to improve their EHR implementation, their efficiencies, enhance health care quality and safety, remove chaos from your current workflow, improve care coordination (HealtIT.gov., 2019).
As a DNP leader, I would assess to understand what will be involved, such as patients, a new EHR system. I would communicate with the senior information technology (IT) analyst team to understand what kind of system they plan to implement and then plan for a meeting with the nurses that will be working with the EHR to inform them of the system and when training would begin. The training would take place for 1-2 weeks at the most one month to make sure that all the staff is trained appropriately and efficiently by IT professionals and the clinical specialist to integrate the EHR into their work flow. During the implementation, the patients will be informed of the new EHR system and that the IT professionals and the clinical specialist would be available to help the staff to trouble shoot any problems encountered while working with the patients (Fecher, McCarthy, Porreca, & Yaraghi, 2020).
The term “Magnet” is a gold standard term for nursing practice in hospitals which is used to delineate those who are able to attract and retain qualified nurses based on five goals such as transformational leader, structural empowerment, new knowledge, innovation, and empirical outcomes and development. The effectiveness of magnet hospitals is the existence of work environments that focus on decentralized decision-making, autonomy, control over practice, resource adequacy, supportive management, effective inter-professional communication, and career development.
As a DNP leader in a magnet hospital, I will ensure that the staff is well trained to maintain our nursing excellence standards, that the structures required for training are in place during training and during implementation, and that I maintain communication with the staff about when this will occur so that they are well prepared. Adequate structures, such as adequate computers, an IT professional team, and adequate staffing to cover patient care for those in training in order to maintain patient safety and excellent nursing care. Providing adequate information about the improvements in nursing care quality that this new system will provide will increase their desire to learn and implement.
Because the pace would be slower in a rural setting, I would have to rethink my strategy as a DNP leader. I would also need to give them time to adjust to the need for a new EHR system. They will require more time to train and implement because the patient influx may be slower and staffing may be insufficient. As the DNP leader, I will work with all of the leadership teams to inform them of the process change that is taking place and the importance of their collaboration with my team, as well as explain the new changes that will take place to the patients. The leader must also ensure that all structural resources are in place.
References:
Fecher, K., McCarthy, L., Porreca, D. E., & Yaraghi, N. (2020). Assessing the benefits of integrating health information exchange services into the medical practices’ workflow. Information Systems Frontiers, 23(3), 599-605.
HealtIT.gov. (2019). What is workflow redesign? Why is it important? | HealthIT.gov. ONC | Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.
Mondayblog. (2022, March 31). Workflow definitions & templates for 2022. monday.com Blog.
Rivaz, M., Ebadi, A., & Momennasab, M. (2018). The role of magnet hospitals in making the nursing practice environment attractive. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 4(23), 294-290
Zaccagnini, M., & Pechacek, J. M. (2019). The doctor of nursing practice essentials: A new model for advanced practice nursing. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
You are now a DNP-prepared nurse in a new leadership position in clinical practice. Analyze your new practice workflow to incorporate seeing patients and in regards to communication with the health care team and the infusion of the EHR into your practice. What elements do you need to consider if this position is in a magnet acute-care hospital in a busy metropolitan area? How might your practice change if the setting was a rural regional clinic system?
Also Read:
Name: Discussion Rubric
Excellent
90–100 |
Good
80–89 |
Fair
70–79 |
Poor
0–69 |
|||
Main Posting:
Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the Discussion question(s). Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three current credible sources. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the Discussion question(s). Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible references. |
31 (31%) – 34 (34%)
Responds to some of the Discussion question(s). One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Cited with fewer than two credible references. |
0 (0%) – 30 (30%)
Does not respond to the Discussion question(s). Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible references. |
||
Main Posting:
Writing |
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Written clearly and concisely. Contains no grammatical or spelling errors. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Written concisely. May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Written somewhat concisely. May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
||
Main Posting:
Timely and full participation |
9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts main Discussion by due date. |
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Meets requirements for full participation. Posts main Discussion by due date. |
7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Posts main Discussion by due date. |
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post main Discussion by due date. |
||
First Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. |
9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Responds to questions posed by faculty. The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. |
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting. |
7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. |
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. |
||
First Response:
Writing |
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources. Response is written in standard, edited English. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication. Response to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
||
First Response:
Timely and full participation |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts by due date. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Meets requirements for full participation. Posts by due date. |
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts by due date. |
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post by due date. |
||
Second Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. |
9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Responds to questions posed by faculty. The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. |
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting. |
7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. |
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. |
||
Second Response: Writing |
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources. Response is written in standard, edited English. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication. Response to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
||
Second Response: Timely and full participation |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts by due date. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Meets requirements for full participation. Posts by due date. |
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts by due date. |
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post by due date. |
||
Total Points: 100 | ||||||
Name: Discussion Rubric