Assignment: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan NURS 6003
Integrity must be upheld for the classroom learning process to succeed. Upholding integrity is essential to the classroom learning process. It aids in the development of dependability and integrity in individuals who engage in a variety of activities. Academic honesty and writing are closely related. Due to the steps and procedures that must be followed, academic writing poses a lot of challenges when learning or taking courses. Utilizing other people’s work while producing original content is required in academic writing (Walden University Academic Skills Center, n.d). In other words, the entire writing process necessitates uniqueness. Academic integrity is commonly upheld during the writing process when an author or writer uses the words, ideas, or work of another. A person can uphold the institution’s code of conduct and honorably represent the institution in this circumstance. Therefore, academic integrity must be kept throughout the writing process in order to guarantee the authenticity and originality of the work (Walden University Academic Skills Center, n.d). On the other hand, professional conduct and intellectual ethics are closely related. To ensure a high level of integrity in the work being done, scholarly ethics should continually be applied to diverse professional procedures. Scholarly ethics must constantly be upheld by professionals if they hope to maintain a high level of expertise.
Scholarly ethics encompasses all of the implicit and explicit professional characteristics and conventions that define an ethical scholarly community. Academic ethics is typically based on integrity and everything that benefits the educational process in a scholarly community. Professionalism and activity at the highest levels uphold scholarly ethics. Professional conduct frequently necessitates adherence to the moral principles that govern all behavior (Glasper, 2016). Scholarly ethics is linked to ethical standards.
Grammarly, Safe Assign, and paraphrasing contributes to . Grammarly often ensures that there is a proper application of phrases that are in line with the writing standards. Scholarly ethics often require the application of the best practices in the writing process. Adhering to the effective writing process characterized by the standardized format is part of the academic integrity (Glasper, 2016). Paraphrasing, on the other hand, leads to originality in the writing process; it thus prevents plagiarism, a scenario that contributes to high level of academic integrity. Also, SafeAssign prevents the cases of unnecessary plagiarism, a scenario that leads to ethics in the writing process and eventual academic integrity in the wring process.
It is crucial for nursing students at any level to prioritize building their professional network. Nurses can use their professional networks to leverage the individuals they know to help advance their academic careers (Heffernan, 2021). Networks time and again lead to desirable opportunities that benefit job and promotion applications. Besides, they enable individuals to secure full-time, continuing positions (Heffernan, 2021). The purpose of this assignment is to identify my academic and professional networks and explain how the selected individuals will support my in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse.
NETWORK MEMBER 1
Name: Ginny Moore
Title: Academic Coordinator
Organization: Walden University College of Nursing
Academic or Professional: Academic
I selected Dr. Moore because she is the academic program coordinator of the MSN Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioner program. Dr. Moore is board certified as a psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioner (PMHNP) with over 26 years of clinical and administrative experience as a registered nurse (Walden University, 2020). She currently serves as the Academic Program Coordinator for the PMHNP program in the College of Nursing at Walden University. Besides, Dr. Moore is a clinical PMHNP and will guide me to achieve a successful clinical practice as a future PMHNP (Walden University, 2020). Since Dr. Moore has researched education and psychiatric/mental health, I believe she will guide me in the research project for my PMHNP program. Furthermore, she is experienced with evidence-based practice mentorship and is regarded an expert with telepsychiatry. I believe she will support my success in the program by guiding me on applying EBP in providing treatment to psychiatric patients.
Dr. Moore has experience with presentations on psychiatric and substance use disorders, telehealth, nursing education, and primary care- mental health integration topics.
NETWORK MEMBER 2
Name: Barbara Barrett
Title: Core Faculty
Organization: Walden University College of Nursing
Academic or Professional: Academic
I selected Dr. Barrett because she has academic experience in both administrative and faculty roles. She has taught Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing at all levels and would guide me through the MSN program (Walden University, 2020). Dr. Barrett is a board-certified psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioner whose focus is to provide mental health and wellness services in her community. Her research interests entail assisting vulnerable populations in daily living, particularly in transitioning through life (Walden University, 2020). Dr. Barrett will support my success in the MSN program especially, my research project, since I seek to identify interventions that can be implemented to improve the mental wellbeing of vulnerable populations.
Dr. Barrett has been involved in several research projects focusing on foster care, autism, and nursing education. She has various publications and presentations on mental health and wellness related research projects.
NETWORK MEMBER 3
Name: Mary de Sane
Title: MSN Psychiatric Nursing
Organization: Preferred Behavioral Health of NJ
Academic or Professional: Professional
I selected Sane because she is an experienced PMHNP with 13 years of diverse experience. She has vast experience serving different patient populations, including adolescents, adults, older adults, and women (SPAPN, 2021). Sane is experienced managing a myriad of common psychiatric and mental health issues and conditions, including Affective disorders, Anger management, Anxiety disorders, Bipolar disorders, CNS mood disorders, Caregiver issues, Chronic mental illness, Chronic pain, Depression, Domestic violence, Eating disorders, and Family conflicts (SPAPN, 2021). Consequently, she will guide me through my practice as a PMHNP in the aspects of patient assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and psychotherapy. She will also guide me on approaching various patient scenarios and how to run a successful practice as a PMHNP.
Sane’s evaluation & treatment Approaches include Medication management and Prescriptive practice.
NETWORK MEMBER 4
Name: Mona Birk
Title: PhD, APN
Organization: Private Practice: Self-OwnedHospital
Academic or Professional: Professional
I selected Dr. Birk because she is a clinical nurse specialist with over 41 years of experience in nursing practice. In addition, to being a CNS, she is a licensed Marriage and Family Therapist, Licensed Psychologist, and Adult Psychiatric & Mental Health (SPAPN, 2021). She serves various patient populations, including adults, families, older adults, and women (SPAPN, 2021). Consequently, she will guide me in assessing, diagnosing, and managing patients from these populations. Dr. Birk will support my journey as a practicing nurse since she has experience in a myriad of evaluation and treatment approaches. She will guide me in clinical consultation, Cognitive behavioral therapy, Family therapy, Geriatric therapy, Individual therapy, Medication management, Prescriptive practice, and Psychotherapy.
Dr. Birk is experienced in various issues and conditions including ADHD, Affective disorders, Anxiety disorders, Bipolar disorders, Crisis intervention, Dementia, Developmental disabilities, Mood disorders, Quality of life issues, Stress-related disorders, and Women’s issues.
My academic networks are faculty members of the Walden University College of Nursing. They will support my success in the MSN program, mostly in my research project, since they have been involved in various mental health research projects. The professional networks are licensed PMHNPs currently providing mental health care in different care settings. They will support my success as a practicing nurse, mostly in assessing, diagnosis, psychotherapy, and developing patients’ treatment plans.
Heffernan, T. (2021). Academic networks and career trajectory: ‘There’s no career in academia without networks’. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(5), 981-994. ttps://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1799948
Society of Psychiatric Advanced Practice Nurses (SPAPN). (2021). Find a NJ psych APN. NJ Psychiatric APNs: advocacy, education and clinical excellence.
Walden University. (2020). Meet faculty. Accredited Online University | Walden University. https://www.waldenu.edu/why-walden/faculty?college=College%20of%20Nursing
Module2 | Part 2: Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics
Academic integrity is essential to teaching, learning, and research for MSN students. It entails a continuous process of encouraging a multifaceted network of strategies and responsibilities over the MSN program. Academic integrity gives students and the faculty an opportunity to generate new ideas, knowledge, and creativity while acknowledging other people’s work (Newman, 2020). The purpose of this assignment is to explore the relationship between academic integrity and writing as well as between professional practices and scholarly ethics and discuss how Grammarly, Safe Assign, and paraphrasing promote academic integrity.
Part 1: Writing Sample: The Connection Between Academic and Professional Integrity
Academic integrity involves demonstrating a commitment to and honest and moral behavior in academic work. It is mostly related to academic writing at the university level since it entails giving credit to other authors’ work when you use their research work or ideas in writing (Newman, 2020). Academic integrity places an obligation to the student to acknowledge other authors’ contributions. Consequently, academic writers are obliged to acknowledge every source that they have used when writing research papers and essays. Failure to acknowledge others’ work is referred to as plagiarism (Newman, 2020). Furthermore, scholars should apply academic integrity by writing using their own words and ensuring that they do not accidentally misinform readers that the ideas expressed were theirs. Integrity should be applied by the writer understanding and rephrasing the text in their own words but still giving credit to the owner of the ideas.
Professional practices refer to specific behaviors that a particular profession considers appropriate for its members. The behaviors mainly consist of treating colleagues with respect and decorum despite professional and personal differences, mentoring incoming professionals, and serving others (Poorchangizi et al., 2019). Scholarly ethics refer to the entire array of explicit and implicit professional standards and characteristics that define an ethical, honest scholar. A scholar exhibits scholarly ethics by fulfilling the implicit and explicit professional expectations and implementing the practices set by their profession (Stander, 2020). They should also ensure that their professional behaviors and work match the ethical expectations considered crucial in their profession.
Grammarly promotes academic integrity through its plagiarism checker feature, which scans one’s essay or research work for borrowed texts. The feature enables the scholar to identify parts of the essay that have been plagiarized by underlining exact plagiarized texts and their origin (Soni, 2018). SafeAssign promotes academic integrity by checking and preventing plagiarism of texts. It provides scholars with opportunities to insert correct sources instead of just paraphrasing (Soni, 2018). The SafeAssign tool compares the student essay or work against various databases to detect overlapping areas between their essay and existing texts. In addition, paraphrasing promotes academic integrity by having the student write their interpretation of another author’s ideas (Stander, 2020). It is an efficient strategy to restate, compress, and explain another person’s ideas while at the same time ensuring credibility to one’s argument and analysis.
PART 2: Strategies for Maintaining Integrity of Work
Academic integrity at Walden University is considered important to develop students’ intellectual development. As an MSN student, I purpose to maintain the integrity and ethics of my academic work by avoiding incidences of cheating, plagiarism, providing false information, copyright violation, and misrepresentation of credentials (Stander, 2020). I will avoid plagiarism by utilizing tools including SafeAssign and Grammarly. I will also avoid unintentional paraphrasing by ensuring that I have sufficiently paraphrased other authors’ work to avoid having my essay being too similar to the original work (Stander, 2020). Besides, I will cite other authors’ work as many times as I have used their ideas. Furthermore, I will insert a citation having the author’s name, publication year, and the page number after the paraphrased text.
As a practicing nurse, I will uphold integrity by following the nurses’ code of conduct to ensure professionalism. I will also treat my fellow nurses with respect and dignity regardless of their years of experience, professional qualifications, and personal characteristics (Poorchangizi et al., 2019). Furthermore, I will maintain ethics by upholding the ethical principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice in my practice. For instance, I will ensure that interventions implemented on patients will benefit them rather than causing harm (Poorchangizi et al., 2019). I will also ensure that patients are involved in their care, and their treatment decisions are considered when planning treatment. Conclusion
Academic integrity refers to the commitment, honesty, and moral behavior that scholars are expected to demonstrate in academic work. Students are required to acknowledge other authors’ work when writing their essays and research to demonstrate integrity. Professional practices refer to the conduct considered appropriate for members of a particular profession. A scholar should act by this professional conduct as a way of upholding to scholarly ethics. Grammarly and SafeAssign, promotes academic integrity through features that allow students check for plagiarism in their essays. Besides, paraphrasing enables students interpret others’ ideas in their writing, thus avoiding plagiarism.
Newman, J. (2020). Academic integrity in public administration programmes: practical reflections on prevention and response. Teaching Public Administration, 38(1), 63-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739419864128
Poorchangizi, B., Borhani, F., Abbaszadeh, A., Mirzaee, M., & Farokhzadian, J. (2019). The importance of professional values from nursing students’ perspective. BMC nursing, 18(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-019-0351-1
Soni, G. K. (2018). Plagiarism Detection and Prevention: A Study. International Journal of Library & Information Science (IJLIS), 7(1). http://www.iaeme.com/IJLIS/index.asp
Stander, M. (2020). Strategies to help university students avoid plagiarism: a focus on translation as an intervention strategy. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(2), 156-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1526260
|Part 2, Section 1: Using the Academic and Professional Success Development Template write a 2-3 paragraph analysis that includes the following:
· Explanation for the relationship between academic integrity and writing.
32 (32%) – 35 (35%)
The response clearly and accurately explains the relationship between academic integrity and writing.
The response clearly and accurately explains the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics.
The response clearly and accurately describes how Grammarly, SafeAssign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity, including sufficient evidence that Grammarly and SafeAssign were used to improve the responses provided.
28 (28%) – 31 (31%)
The response accurately explains the relationship between academic integrity and writing.
The response accurately explains the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics.
The response accurately describes how Grammarly, SafeAssign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity, including evidence that Grammarly and SafeAssign were used to improve the responses provided.
25 (25%) – 27 (27%)
The response vaguely explains the relationship between academic integrity and writing.
The response vaguely explains the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics.
The response vaguely describes how Grammarly, SafeAssign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity. The response includes insufficient evidence that Grammarly and SafeAssign were used to improve the responses provided.
0 (0%) – 24 (24%)
The response vaguely and inaccurately explains the relationship between academic integrity and writing or is missing. The response vaguely and inaccurately explains the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics or is missing.
The response vaguely and inaccurately describes how Grammarly, SafeAssign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity. The response includes insufficient or no evidence that Grammarly and SafeAssign were used to improve the responses provided or the response is missing.
|Part 2, Section 2: Strategies for Maintaining Integrity of Work
Identify and describe strategies you intend to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of your 1) academic work while a student of the MSN program, and 2) professional work as a nurse throughout your career.
Include a review of resources and approaches you propose to use as a student and a professional.
50 (50%) – 55 (55%)
The response clearly identifies and accurately describes strategies intended to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of academic work while in the MSN program and in professional work as a nurse.
The response clearly reviews and accurately proposes resources and approaches to use as a student and professional.
44 (44%) – 49 (49%)
The response identifies and describes strategies intended to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of academic work while in the MSN program and in professional work as a nurse.
The response reviews and proposes resources and approaches to use as a student and professional.
39 (39%) – 43 (43%)
The response vaguely identifies and describes strategies intended to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of academic work while in the MSN program and in professional work as a nurse.
The response inaccurately reviews and/or vaguely proposes resources and approaches to use as a student and professional.
0 (0%) – 38 (38%)
The response about integrity and ethics strategies is vague and inaccurate or is missing.
The response about resources and approaches is vague and inaccurate or is missing.
|Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.||
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time.
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.
|Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
|Total Points: 100|