As the health care reform debate moves forward, there has been a lot of discussion about stakeholders and potential winners and losers. Prepare a PowerPoint presentation containing 10-15 slides in which you:
- Select a stakeholder from among the stakeholder groups described in class.
- Describe the stakeholder’s position on health care reform.
Provide rationale. Explain why the stakeholder has taken this position.
While GCU format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using GCU documentation guidelines, which can be found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
Stakeholder Presentation Scoring Guide
Criteria | Non-performance | Basic | Proficient | Distinguished |
---|---|---|---|---|
Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal. | Does not describe an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal. | Describes an organizational or patient issue but the way in which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal is unclear or missing. | Explains an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal. | Explains an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal, noting potential consequences of not addressing the issue. |
Summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue. | Does not summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue. | Discusses an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan, but its relevance to an organizational or patient issue is unclear. | Summarizes an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue. | Summarizes an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue, noting specific sources of evidence used to develop the plan. |
Explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed. | Does not explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed. | Explains how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented or how the human and financial resources would be managed, but not both. | Explains how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed. | Explains how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed, providing real-world examples relevant to the context of the health care organization. |
Propose evidence-based criteria to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal. | Does not propose evidence-based criteria to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal. | Proposes irrelevant criteria or criteria not based in evidence to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal. | Proposes evidence-based criteria to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal. | Proposes evidence-based criteria to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal, noting specific sources of evidence used to develop the criteria. |
Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed speaker notes are provided. | Slides are difficult to read with multiple editing errors. No speaker notes provided. | Slides are easy to read with few editing errors. Speaker notes are sufficient to support the slides. | Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed speaker notes are provided. | Slides are easy to read and clutter free. Slide background is “visually” pleasing with a contrasting color for the text and may utilize graphics. Detailed speaker notes are provided. |
Organize content with clear purpose /goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years) with an APA formatted reference list with few errors. | Does not organize content with clear purpose/goals. Power point slides do not support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations. Sources are not relevant and/or evidence-based (published within 5 years). No reference list provided. | Organizes content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years) with a reference list not in APA format/or has many errors in format. | Organizes content with clear purpose /goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years) with an APA formatted reference list with few errors. | Organizes content with clear purpose/goals. Power point slides support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years) with a flawless APA formatted reference list. |