Week 4 Assignment 1: Annotated Bibliography—Conflict Resolution
Fortin, A., Paradis, A., Lapierre, A., & Hébert, M. (n.d.). Validation of the French-Canadian adaptation of the Conflict Resolution Styles Inventory for adolescents in dating relationships. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, , Oct, 2020., Vol 52(4), 337-342. http://dx.doi.org.regiscollege.idm.oclc.org/10.1037/cbs0000173
The authors at universite du Quebec a Montreal used data from adolescent girls and boys in two studies to test the hypothesis that constructive strategies promote conflict resolution, while destructive strategies escalate conflict. A French-Canadian version of the conflict resolution styles inventory (CRSI) tool was used together with a Thomas Kilmann conflict mode instrument (TKI) translated from English to French and vice versa. First analysis measured convergent validity and resulted in positive quality of relationship combination together with use of positive problem-solving strategies. Second analysis found 3 factors corresponding to positive problem solving, conflict engagement and withdrawal.
The authors were staff or members in the psychology and sexology departments, implying that their writing was from a higher level of education, and the article was intended for public knowledge, to educate them about resolving conflicts. It was published by the Canadian journal of behavioral sciences/Revue Canadienne des sciences du comportment. Limitations included items that were not codeveloped with adolescents, hence not reflecting their reality appropriately. The sample size was small, making it hard to represent all adolescent population. And the cross-sectional design in the study limited the ability to conclude regarding the temporal stability of the instrument.
This study and its outcomes related to nursing leadership in a way that it taught us how leaders could solve conflicts in the workplace for instance, when coworkers were having a hard time working together. Constructive strategies would be applied during a conflict because of the positive feedback. It met effective communication strategies with different people to maximize health care delivery. Strategies of conflict resolution were met in the assignment objectives. AS a future practitioner, constructive strategies would be applied when communicating with patients, families and staff.
Article #2
Moss, M., Kikumoto, A., & Mayr, U. (2020). Does conflict resolution really work? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol 46(12), 2410-2426. http://dx.doi.org.regiscollege.idm.oclc.org/10.1037/xlm0000801
The researchers at university of Oregon investigated how overcoming conflict influences the maintenance of working memory representation and vice versa. The strategy was to find out whether or not two functions with same common resources could access the degree of mutual interference with a dual task situation. Participants were tested in four experiments, from auditory stroop task to working memory encoding phase. Results showed that a weak evidence of working memory demands, and conflict resolution demands should interfere with each other during maintenance phase.
Important information for writing discussion questions and participation
Welcome to class
Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to
I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.
Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.
If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.
Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.
Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.
I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!
Hi Class,
Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.
Contact me if you have any questions.
Important information on Writing a Discussion Question
- Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
- There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
- Include in-text citations in your response
- Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
- Follow APA-7th edition
- Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor
- A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
- Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
- Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
- Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
- Follow APA 7th edition
- Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
- Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
- Here are some helpful links
- The is a great resource
The researchers were staff at university of Oregon in the Psychology department, which set their writing to a graduate level. The authors wanted to capture the attention of the general population about relationships between working memory and conflict resolution. Weaknesses from the study were different sample sizes in the experiments, leading to inconsistences. Secondly, working memory was only supposed to be used for stroop accuracy, but was used in all experiments, leading to wrong responses
The article was intended to point out how working memory helps in conflict resolution, however due to the inconsistences in the sample size and application of working memory in all experiments instead of one, the results showed a non-existing relationship, or implied that conflict resolution does not require central attention resources. Therefore, this related to nursing leadership that memory does not help resolve conflicts, for instance, no long-term memory is needed to resolve a conflict between patients and staff. The study integrated research adaptation, critical thinking skills in nursing leadership, advanced practice while exploring how to resolve conflicts. Memory should not be the priority reason I base the inability to resolve a conflict, as a practitioner, I should look at other factors that would hinder the resolution, such as insensitivity, untrustworthy and so on.
Article # 3
Ponsford, M. (n.d.). Conflict Resolution Processes in End-of-Life Care Disputes between Families and Healthcare Providers in Canada. Vol. 25, 83-106.
This study examined conflict resolution processes that could have provided a solution during stressful, costly and time-consuming ordeal. Empathy and cultural understanding were also included mainly when cross-cultural conflict affected decision-making at end of life. The author covered the causes of conflict and how to resolve them. Bill 52 was introduced to ensure respect and dignity were maintained for patients and was signed in 2015. Through the bill, the author examined communication strategies, arising disputes in physicians and families during such difficult times. The author used demographics and social attitudes of the Canadians as samples. A previous study reported 67% in favor of legalizing Euthanasia, and 76% believed legalization would have led to better guidelines for providers.
The author had a master’s in law and specialized in medico-legal research, and a previous author of eight journals articles, which made
this article credible and placed his writing on a highly educated level. His article was intended for the public, more so families that struggled to understand what their loved ones went through during end-of-life stages. Limitations for this study included the research being secondhand information. The author relied on research results from other studies to compile this information.
The research related to leadership and nursing in a way that as nurses, death and dying are not uncommon, therefore there are always problems or disagreements between providers and families when it came to discussing end-of-life, especially when the patients never left wills or signed advanced directives, the burden fell on family members. Therapeutic communication with families was covered in the course objective, while conflict resolution strategies met the assignment objective. As a future leader, communication would be of great important, because it is a pathway to a great relationship with both patients and their families.
NU 605 Week 4 Assignment 1: Annotated Bibliography—Conflict Resolution
Value: 100 points
Due: Day 7
Grading Category: Annotated Bibliography Assignments
Instructions
Read three scholarly articles on nursing and conflict management. Summarize and critically analyze each article separately (250–300 words for each article’s annotated bibliography).
For each article, determine the following:
- Identify and read relevant sources
- Summarize the purpose of the article, point or argument that the author is attempting to make
- Analyze the quality of the article by providing relevant details about the author credentials and authority to write the article, level of writing and intended audience, legitamcy of the content, and any limitations or weaknesses
- Evaluate the value of the article content to assignment objectives, course objectives, and nursing in general
Please refer to the for details on how this activity will be graded.
To Submit Your Assignment:
- Select the Add Submissions button.
- Drag or upload your file to the File Picker.
- Select Save Changes.
Submission status
Annotated Bibliography Rubric
Note: An appropriate scholarly resource for this assignment is a current (within five years) evidence-based practice article from a peer-reviewed journal. Review assignment instructions for any additional requirements such as number of annotations to include.
Criteria | Exemplary Exceeds Expectations |
Advanced Meets Expectations |
Intermediate Needs Improvement |
Novice Inadequate |
Total Points |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Identifies Relevant Sources
Selected articles: |
Relate directly to the topic and report results of empirical research studies conducted by the authors.
15 points |
Relate directly to the topic and include two original research studies.
13 points |
May or may not relate directly to the topic and include only one original research study.
11 points |
Do not clearly relate to the topic and do not include original research.
10 points |
15 |
Annotation summarizes the article’s
Purpose Point or argument Each annotation: |
Summarizes in the student’s own words—the purpose of the study, sample description, tool(s) used, significant findings, and point or argument that the author is trying to make.
20 points |
Summarizes in the student’s own words—the purpose of the article and point or argument that the author is trying to make.
17 points |
Summarizes the purpose of the article with reliance on quotations.
15 points |
Summarizes the article with reliance on quotations and without a clear identification of purpose.
13 points |
20 |
Annotation analyzes quality of each article’s
Author credentials and authority Level of writing Intended audience Legitimacy of content Limitations/ weaknesses Each annotation: |
Provides relevant detail to analyze each component of criteria.
20 points |
Analyzes each component of criteria but may miss relevant detail for one area.
17 points |
Misses relevant detail or two areas of identified criteria.
15 points |
Misses three or more areas of identified criteria.
13 points |
20 |
Annotation evaluates value of each article to
Assignment objectives Course objectives Nursing in general Each annotation: |
Evaluates the usefulness or value of the article’s content by aligning significant findings or results to assignment and course objectives, and nursing in general.
25 points |
Evaluates the usefulness or value of the articles content to assignment and course objectives, and nursing in general.
22 points |
Misses one or two components of evaluation.
19 points |
Misses three or more components of evaluation.
17 points |
25 |
Organization:
Concise Logical Each annotation: |
Evaluates each article in a concise, logical flow of ideas, and is without repetition.
10 points |
Evaluates two articles with a logical flow of ideas and is without repetition.
8 points |
Evaluates a single article with errors in flow of ideas.
7 points |
Evaluates a single article with errors in flow of ideas significantly distracting from content.
6 points |
10 |
APA Reference:
Components Punctuation Capitalization Italics Spacing Each reference: |
Meets all format criteria.
5 points |
Has one consistent format error.
4 points |
Has two consistent format errors.
3 points |
Has more than two format errors.
2 points |
5 |
Grammar and Spelling
Each annotation: |
Avoids awkward transitions, overuse of conjunctions, spelling, word-usage, or punctuation errors.
5 points |
Has less than two grammar, word-usage, spelling, or punctuation errors.
4 points |
Has three or more grammar, spelling, word-usage, or punctuation errors.
3 points |
Has grammar, spelling, word-usage, and punctuation errors that significantly distract from content.
2 points |
5 |
Total Points | 100 |