NURS 350 Literature Search Rapid Critical Appraisal

For this assignment, you will locate a minimum of four research articles related to the topic and PICOT questions that you developed in Week 2. The articles must be published in the last five years (2014 to the present). Two articles must be quantitative, and two articles must be qualitative.

Articles used for one assignment cannot be used for the other assignments. (Students should find new research articles for each assignment.)

The selected articles should be original research articles. Review articles, meta-analysis, meta-synthesis, and systemic review should not be used.

Mixed-methods studies should not be used.

There are two parts to this assignment.

Part 1: Complete a Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklist chart for each research article (4 total).

Download the Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklist here (PDF—use with Adobe Acrobat)

Download the Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklist here (Word document)

Part II: Write a summary (2–3 pages)

Compare and contrast the similarities and differences among the four research articles.

Submit the 4 completed CHECKLISTS along with your summary.

You should:

Use current APA Style to format your paper and to cite your sources.

Review the rubric for further information on how your assignment will be graded.

For this assignment you will use the Quantitative and the Qualitative article that you submitted for week 4 assignment that were related to your week 2 picot question.
Only articles you uploaded and used in week 4 (Quantitative or Qualitative) are to be submitted. Articles must be current (within the last 5 years). All articles must be related to the field of nursing and related to the topic list from week 2.

NURS 350 Literature Search Rapid Critical Appraisal and Summary

Write a summary (one to two pages)
In the summary identify differences in article designs and research methods. Describe the differences in your articles designs and methods. Carefully review the rubric before you submit. This summary is using your own words to examine the differences specifically between the articles.
Use current APA style for your summary paper and to cite your sources.
Submit the Articles and the summary

Learning Outcomes
1) Describe how to do a rapid critical appraisal.

2) Assess the quality, dependability, and application of the data.

3) Determine the patient’s or project’s relevance.

Study of a Case

according to NURS 350 Literature Search Rapid Critical Appraisal, Kelly’s literature search turned up a large number of papers in the database she chose. But how can she whittle down the list and figure out which items are most important to her project? She has to take a fast look at them all to see which ones offer the most accurate and meaningful answers and can best answer her PICOT query. Is there a method she can use that is both quick and detailed?

After you’ve gathered the relevant literature for your clinical question, use a brief critical evaluation to assess the literature’s relevance to your PICOT (or to your evidence-based practice initiative).

What is the definition of a fast critical appraisal?

A quick critical appraisal (RCA) is basically assessing the value of a study based on its validity, reliability, and clinical application. In most cases, an RCA includes a checklist to assist the reviewer in swiftly determining the study’s suitability and whether it can be applied to their patients.

Although there are various RCA tools available, the majority of them address three critical issues for determining the quality of a study:

Are the study’s findings reliable?

What were the outcomes, and how significant were they?

Do the findings address my PICOT question in a way that will assist me care for my patient in this situation as satted by NURS 350 Literature Search Rapid Critical Appraisal?

Checklist for a quick critical appraisal

To answer these three questions, we can utilize a checklist as a reference. First, let’s break down the checklist into the overarching question and go over each section’s individual method.

Question 1: Are the study’s findings reliable?

The correctness of the outcomes is referred to as validity. To put it another way, this inquiry asks, “How accurate are the study’s results, and can they be trusted?”

We need to locate some answers in order to answer this question.

First and foremost, we must analyze how study participants were selected. Were they chosen at random or through some other means? Were any steps taken to reduce the likelihood of skewed outcomes as a result of how participants were chosen?

Next, we must assess the data’s accuracy and completeness. Did the study’s authors employ a validated and reliable measure or instrument (such as a survey tool)?

Finally, we must identify which data was included and which data was removed from the analysis as required by NURS 350 Literature Search Rapid Critical Appraisal . Is it clear that the researchers went to reasonable lengths to ensure that the data was accurate and complete? Do we know the results are an accurate picture of what is being measured? Reliability relates to dependability and consistency.

Question 2: What were the outcomes, and how significant were they?

This inquiry essentially asks, “What did the study find, and is it significant?”

Because you’ll need to know statistics to answer some of these questions, we’ll go through statistical terms.

The “treatment effect” is a term that appears frequently in the literature. To comprehend the treatment effect, we must first comprehend the effect size and level of significance.