NR 505 Chamberlain College Week 4 Qualitative Research Appraisal PICOT Questions
NR 505 Chamberlain College Week 4 Qualitative Research Appraisal PICOT Questions
With new information continually emerging, professional nurses must be equipped to critique scholarly literature and discern its value for practice.
Select one current, quantitative scholarly nursing article related to your PICOT question (SEPSIS) and determine its strengths, limitations, and potential application.
Complete the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice Appendix E Evidence Appraisal Tool Download Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice Appendix E Evidence Appraisal Tool . Once you’ve completed the tool, use your own words to summarize your appraisal of the article. Include the following:
- Description of the purpose
- Explanation of research design
- Discussion of sample
- Description of data collection methods
- Summary of findings
- Strengths of the study (minimum of 1)
- Limitations of the study (minimum of 1)
- Recommendations regarding potential application for future practice that are insightful and appropriate.
- Reflection: write 1-2 paragraphs reflecting on your learning for the week. Guiding questions are provided or you may write about what you felt was most significant to you for the week.
- How hard was it to find a quantitative article related to your area of interest?
- Did you have any difficulty determining whether the articles you reviewed were quantitative?
- Is the quantitative approach appropriate for your area of interest? Would you be able to replicate the study you found?
The John Hopkins tool does not need to be turned in, it is a worksheet for you to decide what type of article you have.
| Evidence level and quality rating: |
|
| Article title: | Number: |
| Author(s): | Publication date: |
| Journal: | |
| Setting: | Sample (composition and size): |
| Does this evidence address my EBP question?
Yes No-Do not proceed with appraisal of this evidence |
|
| Is this study:
QuaNtitative (collection, analysis, and reporting of numerical data) Common methods are surveys, face-to-face structured interviews, observations, and reviews of records or documents. Statistical tests are used in data analysis. Go to Section I: QuaNtitative QuaLitative (collection, analysis, and reporting of narrative data) Common methods are focus groups, individual interviews (unstructured or semi structured), and participation/observations. Sample sizes are small and are determined when data saturation is achieved. Data saturation is reached when the researcher identifies that no new themes emerge and redundancy is occurring. Synthesis is used in data analysis. Often a starting point for studies when little research exists; may use results to design empirical studies. The researcher describes, analyzes, and interprets reports, descriptions, and observations from participants. Go to Section II: QuaLitative Mixed methods (results reported both numerically and narratively) Data collection involves collecting and analyzing both quaNtitative and quaLitative data in a single study or series of studies. Interpretation is continual and can influence stages in the research process. Go to Section III: Mixed Methods |
|
WOULD YOU LIKE ASSISTANCE IN THIS PAPER? ORDER NOW!
https://nursingassinmentshelp.com/
